Home | News | Special Reports | Media Spin | Audio | Multimedia | Interactive | Surf China
     
The Shutting Down of an Unethical Beauty Salon
    2008-04-09 21:38:39     CRIENGLISH.com

In Zhengzhou, two female students who both chose the 38 Yuan hair service at a hair salon called Paul International were asked to pay a total of 12 thousand Yuan afterwards. This grabbled national attention after the scandal was revealed in several newspapers and on CCTV. Last week, the involvement of Zhengzhou government resulted in a 500 thousand Yuan fine for the hair salon, which was shut down.

An article in The Beijing News says it's great to see the closure of the beauty salon. Meanwhile, the dramatic change in the attitude of the authority is doubtful. Officer in Price Control Bureau once commented that they could do nothing to the salon as it had labeled the price properly. However, with coverage by the media, five government departments were conducting investigation at one time. Later they found out that Paul International had many other problems including using illegitimate products and tax evasion. Why did the authority act so differently before and after media coverage? No one has the answer yet.

Another article on National Business Daily criticizes the authority for negligence. They questioned why the Price Control Bureau did not supervise the pricing regularly and condemned the Commerce and Industry Bureau for not examining the products displayed in the salon. It is also questionable if the channel for reporting complaints to the consumer association is accessible. It is believed that the scandal could have been avoided if the authorities did their jobs properly.

An article in Sanqin Daily demands the rationales behind the fine of 500 thousand Yuan. Although the behavior of the salon has aroused public condemnation, and it must pay for its wrong doing, but the punishment must come within the frame of law. Furthermore, the salon is already closed, will the notice of the fine that was posted on the door reach its owner? And how is the bureau going to run after the fine? We have no idea.

 

         Bookmark and Share
Recommend


Bridging the Strait.com claims the copyright of all material and information produced originally by our staff. All rights reserved. Reproduction of text for non-commercial purposes only is permitted provided that both the source and author are acknowledged and a notifying email is sent to us.

CRIENGLISH.com holds neither liability nor responsibility for materials attributed to any other source. Such information is provided as reportage and dissemination of information but does not necessarily reflect the opinion of or endorsement by Bridging the Strait.com.

 
Latest News
• China UnionPay Eases Disruptions
• Insurance Payment for Victims Made Easy
• Airlines Raise Fuel Levy due to Oil Costs
• Earthquake Shakes Tourism Industry
• Vice Premier Urges Efforts to Restore Power Supply

Listen Now
News & Reports 2008-07-05
The cross-strait weekend chartered flights between the Chinese mainland and Taiwan start.
• A War to Divide Property 2008-10-27
• Qingdao Endeavors to Tackle Algae Bloom around Olympic Venue
• What You Mostly Want to Say: Writing Topic for Quake-region Students
• More Owners of Idle Cars Emerge in China
• Let's Start from Smoke-free Olympics
• Licenses Necessary for Profit-making Net-shops
• Chinese Police, Ready for Tighten Security for the Olympics

Multimedia
Beijing Opens Second Airport Expressway
Images of Chinese Migrant Workers in Foreign Artist's Lens