CRI Home - Photo- Forums - Talk China - Surf China - About China -  
  Webcast | CRI Today | China | World | Biz | SciTech | Sports | Life | Showbiz | Easy FM | Learn Chinese / English | Weather | Events
 
Judge Rules Against 'Intelligent Design'
2005-12-21 0:32:39    CRIENGLISH.com


(Lehigh University professor Michael Behe, wearing hat, speaks to reporters after testifying in federal court in Harrisburg, Pa., Monday, Oct. 17, 2005. Evolutionary theory should be taught to science students, but it alone cannot explain complex biological phenomenon, said Behe, who is a leading advocate of ``intelligent design.'' Behe was the first witness called by a school board that is requiring students to hear a statement about the concept in biology class. The federal trial could decide whether intelligent design can be mentioned in public school science classes as an alternative to the theory of evolution.  Photo: AP)

"Intelligent design" cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial.

The Dover Area School Board violated the Constitution when it ordered that its biology curriculum must include "intelligent design," the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III ruled Tuesday.

The school board policy, adopted in October 2004, was believed to have been the first of its kind in the nation.

"The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the Board who voted for the ID Policy," Jones wrote. "It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy."

The board's attorneys said members sought to improve science education by exposing students to alternatives to Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection causing gradual changes over time; intelligent-design proponents argue that it cannot fully explain the existence of complex life forms.

The plaintiffs argued that intelligent design amounts to a secular repackaging of creationism, which the courts have already ruled cannot be taught in public schools.

The Dover policy required students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. The statement said Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact," has inexplicable "gaps," and refers students to an intelligent-design textbook, "Of Pandas and People," for more information.

Jones said advocates of intelligent design "have bona fide and deeply held beliefs which drive their scholarly endeavors" and that he didn't believe the concept shouldn't be studied and discussed.

"Our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom," he wrote.

The dispute is the latest chapter in a long-running debate over the teaching of evolution dating back to the famous 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial, in which Tennessee biology teacher John T. Scopes was fined $100 for violating a state law that forbade teaching evolution.

The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed his conviction on the narrow ground that only a jury trial could impose a fine exceeding $50, and the law was repealed in 1967.

Jones heard arguments in the fall during a six-week trial in which expert witnesses for each side debated intelligent design's scientific merits. Other witnesses, including current and former school board members, disagreed over whether creationism was discussed in board meetings months before the curriculum change was adopted.

The controversy also divided the community and galvanized voters to oust eight incumbent school board members who supported the policy in the Nov. 8 school board election. They were replaced by a slate of eight opponents who pledged to remove intelligent design from the science curriculum.

The case is among at least a handful that have focused new attention on the teaching of evolution in the nation's schools.

Earlier this month, a federal appeals court in Georgia heard arguments over whether evolution disclaimer stickers placed in a school system's biology textbooks were unconstitutional. A federal judge in January ordered Cobb County school officials to immediately remove the stickers, which called evolution a theory, not a fact.

In November, state education officials in Kansas adopted new classroom science standards that call the theory of evolution into question.

(Source: AP)

      Talk China     Print     Email     Recommend



CRIENGLISH.com claims the copyright of all material and information produced originally by our staff. All rights reserved. Reproduction of text for non-commercial purposes only is permitted provided that both the source and author are acknowledged and a notifying email is sent to us.

CRIENGLISH.com holds neither liability nor responsibility for materials attributed to any other source. Such information is provided as reportage and dissemination of information but does not necessarily reflect the opinion of or endorsement by CRI.


      Today's Focus
CartoonPresident Bush called for an end to the worldwide violence triggered by the caricatures issue.
Foot-and-mouth DiseaseArgentina has discovered a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in its Corrientes province.
Rene PrevalFormer Haitian President is leading the vote count after the presidential elections.
Latest
DPRK Asks Fertilizer Provision from S.Korea
DPRK Clarifies Stand on Inter-Governmental Talks with Japan
Two Palestinian Militants Killed at Erez Crossing
Up to Eight Dead in Pakistan Blasts: Minister
US Secret Court Judges Warned about NSA Data: Report
Iran Stresses It's Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purpose
UN Court Upholds Ex-Rwandan Minister Acquittal
More>>

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 


 Producer: Xie Qiao   Pagemaker: Wang Dandan    Designer: Avida